Writing is an art and sometimes difficult to grade. At the same time, writing is also a craft. This is particularly true in the field of history, where the distinction between "good" and "bad" history can be reasonably assessed. In this course, I use a grading rubric for your writing assignments. See chart below.
-------------------
Paper Grading Rubric:
Grading Criteria: Excellent PaperA/A- | Grading Criteria: Good B+/B/B- | Grading Criteria: Fair C+/C/C- | Grading Criteria: Poor D+/D-/F | |
Thesis | Clear; stated up front; thoughtful; strong topic paragraph or sentence | Slightly unclear; no strong introduction | Unclear thesis and introduction | No thesis or introduction |
Structure | Strong transitions between ideas; clear references to argument; clear arc (beginning/ middle/end) | Generally clear, but weak transitions; vague references to thesis | Somewhat coherent but weak transitions; vague or no reference to thesis | Lack of structure or coherence |
Analysis | Demonstrates an understanding of the readings; connects evidence with argument | Reference to but not a clear understanding of readings; vague connection between evidence and argument | Very weak understanding of readings; little connection between evidence and argument | Unable to demonstrate analysis or understanding of sources |
Evidence | Clearly highlighted; multiple examples; use of variable sources | Ambiguous use of sources; one-dimensional use | Unclear and/or little use of sources | Little or no use of evidence |
Mechanics | No typos, fragments, or run-on sentences; no awkward constructions; no misuse of citations | Minor typos and grammatical errors; run-on sentences | Frequent typos, grammatical, and punctuation errors; frequent run-on sentences | Poorly written with frequent errors |
No comments:
Post a Comment